Author Archives: dennisschmickle

Harmony and variety in pattern design

I’ve been thinking about this very thing for a while now. Typically, I don’t like grid patterns with a square foundation that don’t interact in some way from one cell to another. There should be some kind of angles or overlap from one cell to the next. Even better is when you can’t easily spot the borders from one cell to the next.

Owen Jones had it figured out 100 years ago.

“In surface decoration, any arrangement of forms, as at A, consisting of only straight lines, is monotonous, and affords but imperfect pleasure; but introduce lines which tend to carry the eye toward the angles, as at B, and you have at once an increased pleasure. Then add lines giving a circular tendency, as at C, and you have now complete harmony. In this case the square is the leading form or tonic; the angular and curved are subordinate.

We may produce the same result in adopting an angular composition, as at D: add the lines as at E, and we at once correct the tendency to follow only the angular direction of the inclined lines; but unite these by circles, as at F, and we have still more perfect harmony, i.e. repose, for the eye has now no longer any want that could be supplied.”

– Owen Jones, The Grammar of Ornament–1910

Designer as Omnivore

Of course Paul Rand summarized my design philosophy in three sentences (in his book, A Designer’s Words).

“The artist is by necessity a collector; he accumulates things with the same ardor and curiosity [with which] a boy stuffs his pockets. He borrows from the sea and from the scrap heap; he takes snapshots, makes mental notes, and records impressions on tablecloths and newspapers—why one particular thing and not another, he may not know at the time, but he is omnivorous. He has a taste for children’s wall scrawling as appreciative as that for prehistoric cave painting.”—Paul Rand, 1955, via Steven Heller